← The Casebook

Case file

Conjunction Fallacy

Filed under
Need To Act Fast

The charge

We judge a detailed, specific scenario as more likely than a broader, simpler one that actually contains it.


How it operates

A vivid, coherent story feels representative, and that feeling can override formal probability rules.

Logged incidents

  1. Incident 01

    A recruiter thinks a candidate is more likely to be a strong operator and beloved people manager than simply a strong operator.

  2. Incident 02

    An investor judges 'AI company with rapid international expansion' as more likely than 'AI company.'

  3. Incident 03

    A PM thinks 'launch succeeds and goes viral on LinkedIn' is more likely than 'launch succeeds.'

What to watch for

It often shows up when a richer story feels more probable than a plain category. Ask: 'Is the specific story actually a subset of the general one?'

Recommended action

Translate probabilities into frequencies and use nested-set framing.

Known associates

Source of record

en.wikipedia.org

File your own case

Open the same case on your own draft.

Paste a memo, a research draft, or a strategy argument. It is scored against all 175 cards, and the strongest two or three risks come back with the evidence quoted and one practical next check.

Open a case on your draft →